Books

•    HIRATA, A., Hidden Hunger: gender and the politics of smarter foods, Cornell University Press, 2013 https://muse.jhu.edu/book/43573
•    JOLLIFFE, D., ET AL, «Income volatility and food assitence in the united states», W.E. Upjohn Institute, 2008, https://muse.jhu.edu/book/17388
•    MORGAN, B., The Constitutionality of Restricting the Use of Prescriber- Identifiable Data in Pharmaceutical Detailing After Citizens United v . FEC [Internet]. Harvard University’s DASH repository. Harvard University’s DASH repository; 2010. Available from: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8822170%0AThis
•    REGULATION OF AGRICULTURAL Biotechnology in Canada A Post-Secondary Educator’s Resource http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2007/cfia-acia/A104-24-2007E.pdf
•    SPINK JW. Analysis of counterfeit risks and development of a counterfeit product risk model [Internet]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. United States: ProQuest LLC; 2009. 195 p. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/304947970?accountid=10297%5Cnhttp://metalib.dmz.cranfield.ac.uk:9003/cranfield?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&genre=dissertations+&+theses&sid=ProQ:ABI/INFORM+Global&atitle=&title=Analy

Articles

•    BERLAND-BENHAÏM, C., PELISSIER-ALICOT, A.L., LEONETTI, G., Non-respect des règles de dispensation des médicaments et responsabilité du pharmacien d’officine. Med Droit. 2011;2011(109):185–9.
•    CURFMAN, G.D., MORRISSEY, S., DRAZEN, J.M., Prescriptions, Privacy, and the First Amendment. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2053–5.
•    DE MIGUEL BERIAIN, I., La objeción de conciencia del farmacéutico?: una mirada crítica. Rev Derecho la UNED. 2010;(6):173–98.
•    FAGAN, JOHN, Chapter 33 – John Fagan – Monitoring GMOs Released into the Env. and the Food Production System , Biosafety First (2007) Traavik, T. and Lim, L.C. (eds.), Tapir Academic Publishers
•    FORSBERG, C.W., GOLOVAN, S.P., AJAKAIYE, A., PHILLIPS, J.P., MEIDINGER, R.G., FAN, M.Z., KELLY, J.M. AND HACKER, R.R., 2005. Genetic opportunities to enhance sustainability of pork production in developing countries: A model for food animals. Pp. 429-446 In Applications of gene-based technololgies for improving animal production and health in developing countries. H.P.S. Makkar and G.J. Viljoen (eds.) Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
•    FUGH-BERMAN, A., Prescription tracking and public health. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(8):1277–80.
•    GREENE, J.A., Pharmaceutical marketing research and the prescribing physician. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(10):742–8.
•    HALLOUARD, F., BONTEMPS, H., DENIS, I., PABST, J.Y., FESSI, H., La dispensation pharmaceutique de médicaments en France. Partie II: Les responsabilités pénales, civiles et disciplinaires. Med Droit. 2012;2012(116).
•    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FEMINIST APPROACHES TO BIOETHICS,»Food, health and global justice», Vol.8 , No. 2, Fall 2015, University of Toronto Press https://muse.jhu.edu/article/592292
•    KESSELHEIM, A.S., ROBERTSON, C.T., SIRI, K., BATRA, P., FRANKLIN, J.M., Distributions of Industry Payments to Massachusetts Physicians. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(22):2049–52.
•    LIBRARY, S., CORE, C., GLOBAL, M., GOVERNANCE, T., RESEARCHER, S., ECONOMIC, G., ET AL. Revista El Foro. Álvarez Hernandez F, Mora Vargas H, editors. Rev El Foro Col Abogados Costa Rica. 10th ed. 2009;53(9):116.
•    LOPEZ JIMENEZ, D., MONROY, ANTON A., Nuevas coordenadas en materia de publicidad relativa a medicamentos: instrumentos éticos de tutela del consumidor en internet. Cienc Ergo Sum. 2012;19(1):35–44.
•    MACLAUGHLIN, SARA, J., Food for the Twenty-First Century: An Analysis of Regulations for Genetically Engineered Food in the United States, Canada, and the European Union ,14 Ind. Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 375, 383 (2003–2004).
•    MATTHEWS GLEN, JANE, The Coexistence of Genetically Modified and Non-genetically Modified Agriculture in Canada: A Courtroom Drama, in The Regulation of Genetically Modified Organisms: Comparative Approaches 267 (Luc Bodiguel & Michael Cardwell eds., 2010).
•    MELLO, M.M., MESSING, N.A., Restrictions on the Use of Prescribing Data for Drug Promotion. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2011;365:1248–54. Available from: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMhle1107678
•    MONTPETIT, ÉRIC., “A Policy Network Explanation of Biotechnology Policy Differences between the United States and Canada.” Journal of Public Policy, vol. 25, no. 3, 2005, pp. 339–366. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/4007834. Accessed 2 July 2020.
•    ORENTLICHER, D., Prescription Data Mining and the Protection of Patients’ Interests. J Law, Med Ethics [Internet]. 2010;38:74–84. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20446986/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20446986/
•    PETER ANDRÉE, PhD, An analysis of efforts to improve genetically modified food regulation in Canada, Science and Public Policy, Volume 33, Issue 5, June 2006, Pages 377–389, https://doi.org/10.3152/147154306781778885
•    PHILLIPS, J.P., Question-and-Answer session for: Development of the Enviropig: A simple, cost-effective approach for meeting nutrient-management requirements for reducing manure-based environmental phosphorus pollution. Assessed 16-Dec 2008.
•    PROSPERI, C.A., Praxis Farmacéutica. Estud Prospery Asoc. 2001;111–27.
•    RAMOS GONZALEZ, S., La responsabilidad por medicamento en el derecho alemán. InDret [Internet]. 2003;(1):114. Available from: www.indret.com
•    SANCHEZ, A.C., La Ley de Protección de Datos de Costa Rica. Luces en las sombras. Rev Int Protección Datos Pers. 2012;(1):5–16.
•    SMITH, C.R., SOMEBODY ’ S WATCHING ME?: PROTECTING PATIENT PRIVACY IN PRESCRIPTION HEALTH INFORMATION. Vt Law Rev. 2011;36(2001):931–94.
•    SULLIVAN, K.M., Implications for Federal Regulation of Pharmaceutical Marketing?? IMS Heal v Sorrell [Internet]. 2011;1–32. Available from: https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/8789615
•    TOTH, R., Criminal liability for dispensing errors. Wisewould Mahony [Internet]. 2009;4. Available from: http://www.wisewouldmahony.com.au/assets/documents/Pharmacists Liability for Dispensing Errors.pdf
•    VAUGHN, R., «The politics of clean», American Studies, Volume 57, No. 1/2, 2018, https://muse.jhu.edu/article/710985

Others
Reports
•    Criterios de inspeccion para el etiquetado de productos con OMG’S https://www.inspection.gc.ca/food-label-requirements/labelling/industry/method-of-production-claims-on-food-labels/genetically-engineered-foods/eng/1333373177199/1333373638071
•    Directivas para la experimentación con especies vegetales con características nuevas. (concepto que incluye pero no se limita a los organismos genéticamente modificados. Directive Dir 2000-07: Conducting Confined Research Field Trials of Plants with Novel Traits in Canada https://www.inspection.gc.ca/plant-varieties/plants-with-novel-traits/applicants/directive-dir-2000-07/eng/1304474667559/1304474738697
•    Reporte en torno a «enviropig» un pureco genéticamente modificado diseñado en una universidad canadiense para digerir mejor el fósoforo y disminuir la contaminación por fosforo en la producción porcina a gran escala https://rcab.ca/wp-content/uploads/CBAN-enviropig-report-2010.pdf
•    Reporte en torno al derecho a la alimentación y la inseguridad alimentaria en Canadá Tarasuk V, Mitchell A. (2020) Household food insecurity in Canada, 2017-18. Toronto: Research to identify policy options to reduce food insecurity (PROOF). Retrieved from https://proof.utoronto.ca/ http://proof.utoronto.ca/resources/proof-annual-reports/household-food-insecurity-in-canada-2017-2018/
•    Reporte en torno al estado de la regulación de los organismos genéticamente modificadoes en Canadá. GMO Inquiry: Are GM Crops and Foods Well Regulated? https://www.rcab.ca/are-gm-crops-and-foods-well-regulated/
•    Reporte legal sobre el marco Federal Regulador de la Biotecnología en Canadá establecido en 1993 el cual establece que los nuevos pproductos desarrollados por medio de biotecnologías serían evaluados usando las regulaciones existentes para los productos tradicionales, esto con el fin de no duplicar regulaciones, agencias y funciones. siendo su enfoque regulatorio basoado en productos finales y no en procesos. https://www.loc.gov/law/help/restrictions-on-gmos/canada.php#:~:text=Health%20Canada%20is%20mandated%20to,a%20health%20or%20safety%20concern.
•    Resumen informativo sobre los criterios de evalución para la seguridad de los alimentos genéticamente modificados https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/genetically-modified-foods-other-novel-foods/safety.html

Websites
•    Biomed Central https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/
•    Encuesta sobre la opinion pública y conocimiento público sobre los organismos genéticamente modificados en general y la «Manzana ártica» en particular https://www.bcfga.com/files/file/Report%20on%20GE%20survey%20-%20July%203%202012.pdf
•    Global Health Now https://www.globalhealthnow.org/
•    Health affairs blog https://www.healthaffairs.org/blog
•    Health and human rights journal https://www.hhrjournal.org/
•    Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
•    Página sobre el derecho a la alimentación en Canadá https://foodsecurecanada.org/fr/le-droit-lalimentation-au-canada#:~:text=Le%20Canada%20a%20l’obligation%20de%20respecter%2C%20prot%C3%A9ger%20et%20r%C3%A9aliser,vivent%20dans%20l’ins%C3%A9curit%C3%A9%20alimentaire.
•    Sitio web de la red de acción canadiense de biotecnología, enfocada en estudiar y monitorear el desarrollo y el impacto de la biotecnología en la agricultura y la cadena de abasto de alimentos  https://www.rcab.ca/about-us/
•    Sitio web del propgrama para la deliberación y debate sobre ciencia de la universidad de Montana donde se discute el caso del puerco «enviropig» desarrollado por  la universidad de gelph en Ontarrio Canadá https://www.umt.edu/ethics/debating%20science%20program/odc/Biotechnology/Alternatives/Enviropig1/recommendations.php
•    Stanford Center for law and biosciences https://law.stanford.edu/center-for-law-and-the-biosciences/#slsnav-events